|
As
long as foundations stay out of this space, their influence will be on
the wane. We are missing opportunities to get our perspective included.
We have a lot of knowledge we’ve learned over the decades, especially
with issues we’ve been funding for a long time. And our voice is
not being heard in some of the more substantive online spaces.
–
Mitch Hurst, The Mott Foundation
Opinions among interviewees
varied greatly about the likelihood that senior foundation leadership
will fully embrace or adapt to the changes in technology—from pessimism
that things will not change until the “old guard” retires,
to optimism that there are leaders in executive suites and board rooms
who will promote and encourage innovation.
“I don’t
think it has to be viewed solely as a generational challenge,” said
Jennifer Humke, communications officer for The John D. and Catherine T.
MacArthur Foundation. “There are a number of 60-plus-year-olds online
and in philanthropy leadership who are willing to experiment and try things.
There is a certain frame of mind that younger generations are willing
to communicate in certain ways, but there are older leaders willing to
embrace these technologies as well.”
Mitch Hurst, team
leader – new media for the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, summed
up the imperative: “As long as foundations stay out of this space,
their influence will be on the wane. We are missing opportunities to get
our perspective included. We have a lot of knowledge we’ve learned
over the decades, especially with issues we’ve been funding for
a long time. And our voice is not being heard in some of the more substantive
online spaces.”
Regardless of the
age of the foundation leaders or their discomfort with new communication
technologies, they ignore Web 2.0 communication methods at their peril.
Foundations must adapt to, incorporate and welcome these new technologies,
along with their attendant challenges and opportunities. Otherwise, they
risk losing the support of the next generation of grantees, policymakers,
philanthropists and stakeholders, and losing the ability to effectively
promote their ideas and programs among the public at large.
|